DEVELOPMENTS ON TORREFIED WOOD

 AN ALTERNATIVE TO CHARCOAL FOR REDUCING DEFORESTATION

 by

 P Girard & N Shah
Centre Technique Forestier Tropical
Department of Cirad
45 Bis, Avenue de la Belle Gabrielle
94736 Nogent Sur Marne cedex
FRANCE

 ABSTRACT

Prospects for torrefied wood, with its specific properties and high-energy yield, are potentially very promising:  

bulletin industry, where its use as a reducer should compare favorably with the use of charcoal, as the cost of low yields when compounded by high wood prices is reflected in rising charcoal production costs.
bulletin the domestic fuel sector, where there is evidence to show that torrefied wood may be more competitive than charcoal in developed countries and in the larger urban centers in arid zones where a correlative reduction in pressures on threatened woodland ecosystems would ensue.

At present 3 production techniques are being successfully tested in France for industrial reliability:

bulletContinuous production of torrefied wood by conduction:

Plant producing 14,000 tons per year is now operating at full capacity. This process uses maxi-chips and produces torrefied wood of uniform quality being a close resemblance to charcoal. Production capacity for the equipment under consideration is of 7, 000 t/year and more.

bulletTwo discontinuous production systems by convection

Equipment now being brought into industrial use has been developed to treat a wide range of particle sixes by partial pyrolysis at more realistic levels of production.

The success of torrefied wood as a reducer in electrometallurgy has been established by experimentation, and prospects for its use as a barbecue fuel are promising.  It is now necessary to define prospects for its use in developing countries, in the domestic fuel, and industrial sectors. These prospects will depend heavily on foreseeable production costs as compared to those of locally produced wood-fuels, and on the extent of local acceptability of torrefied wood as an alternative to charcoal.

A feasibility study undertaken by CTFT in collaboration with A.I.I. (Swiss cooperation) at Rwanda has demonstrated the techno-economic viability of a torrefied wood production project (6,000 tons per year) at KI-GALI. The further acceptability study of this project will be completed by early 1990.

If torrefied wood proves to be widely acceptable in this context, together with its ease of transport, should open up possibilities for broadly based trade in wood fuels between developing countries.

1.0   Preamble

The contribution of fuel wood to world energy supplies is considerable: in 1985 this amounted to 400 million toe, as much as nuclear energy in the same year.

At present, however, the use of wood to supply energy is for the most part limited to domestic heating and cooking needs and to the small scale craft-industry sector in developing countries, and to rural areas in the industrialized timber-producing countries. In France, for example, wood use for residential heating needs amounts to 7 million toe.

Industrial use of wood fuels is widespread only in a few cases - in Brazil for example, where in the industries trial sector, iron and steel and cement manufacture consume some 100 million tonnes of charcoal per year.

In many countries, maintaining wood as a significant contributor to national energy supplies appears to be the best way of ensuring greater autonomy in this area, and also provides a cheap source of energy that helps to promote development in many industrial sectors.

However, wood and charcoal are solid fuels that are difficult to manage, given the wide seasonal variation in their physical - chemical composition and their low energy content. Moreover, their use generally requires some form of prior treatment as well as properly adapted energy transformation equipment.

With long experience in dealing with these constraints, the CTFT has contributed to research in the processing of wood and more generally in the transformation of lignocelluloses material into efficient solid, liquid or gaseous fuels.

Studies have been or are now being carried out along several different lines: 

bulletGasification with air or oxygen (methanol synthesizing)
bulletHigh-temperature and high-pressure hydro liquefaction
bulletWater-based or compound ternary slurries: ligneous fuel (torrefied wood or charcoal) + water + petroleum additive.
bulletTorrefaction through controlled pyrolysis. 

Among these processes, torrefaction has been the first to attain industrial credibility with the production of an efficient solid fuel. We shall now outline the present state of development of this process.

2.0  Torrefied Wood

2.1  Brief historical survey

Charcoal makers have always known the substance now called torrefied wood, and it is most likely that it was used by blacksmiths to reduce iron and obtain primitive steel.

During the 1930's in France, the qualities of what was by then known as torrefied wood warranted subsidies for research into its production and use in gasifiers. The outcome of this appeared to be favorable at the technical stage but, unlike gasifier technology to which it was linked, torrefied wood did not find the market outlets to which it seemed suited at the time.

Research undertaken in the early 1980's by ARMINES (1) in collaboration with the CTFT with the aim of updating and defining knowledge in the field of pyrolysis has now brought the properties of torrefied wood to the fore, and has in particular opened up new possibilities for this product, which now has industrial trial scale market outlets in the field of electrometallurgy.

2.2   Reaction Characteristics

Analysis of the thermal evolution of wood in an inert atmosphere show that wood progressively gives off constituents having greater and greater energy value. At the same time, two of its most important characteristics, where energy production is concerned, are subjected to change in a positive sense: hygroscopicity and friability.

Up to 160 C, wood loses water and little else. Most of its physical and mechanical properties remain intact, particularly its hygroscopic properties (it can reabsorb moisture).

Between 180, and 270 C, wood begins to brown and gives off moisture, carbon dioxide and large amounts of acetic acid with some phenols, the latter in quantities, which increase in proportion as the exothermal stage develops. These first emitted compounds have low energy value, and whilst wood at this stage in torrefaction retains most of its energy potential, it loses its hygroscopic properties and becomes more friable than untreated wood which however is less friable than charcoal.

Torrefaction occurs between 200 and 270 C and wood at this stage in the process acquires the properties, which are specific to the substance known as torrefied wood: 

bullethigh-density energy content, as compounds with high-energy value have not been lost. Energy conversion yields vary from 80-90% depending on the reaction stage reached.
bulletHydrophobia: reabsorption of moisture is practically nil when torrefied wood is stored, with moisture content stabilizing at about 3%.
bulletOptimum durability/friability balance.

The exothermic stage (270 C and over) cannot as yet be controlled within an industrial production process. The generic term of torrefied wood thus defines a group of products resulting from the partially controlled and isothermic pyrolysis of wood or biomass occurring within a temperature range of 200-230 C and 270-280 C.  Each given combination of temperature/processing time/wood species will result in a given product, which can be reproduced with near-perfection.

3.0  Characteristics of Torrefied Wood

The results obtained by ARMINES (2) at pilot-laboratory stage, with beech sawdust and small pine chips, demonstrate the influence of final reaction temperatures and processing time on the quality of the end product, as is shown in Table 1 and Table 2.

The fixed carbon content increases with higher temperatures and with longer processing times. The latter relation, however, rapidly becomes asymptotic. On the basis of these results, the CTFT (3) carried out systematic torrefaction tests on Meranti (shorea) scrap in large chunks, with a 1 m# pilot kiln. For each time - temperature combination, the physical-chemical characteristics of the torrefied wood obtained were measured, as well as conversion yields in weight terms, on Dark and Light Red Meranti. Results are given in Table 3 and Table 4 .

4.0   Torrefaction Processes

Research has been undertaken along two different lines at the pilot stage, and has resulted in the development of industrial equipment of two types: for continuous processes by conduction and for batch processes by convection.

4.1  Continuous processes

In the process developed by PECHINEY Electrometallurgy, a heat transfer fluid circulates within the kiln walls and over the raw material feeder screw. Heat transfer occurs through conduction as wood particles come into contact with the heated surfaces.

With this equipment, wood must first be partially dried, and torrefaction will only give even results if materials of fairly small particle size are used (not more than 10 mm in thickness). A new torrefaction process now being developed is based on heat transfer through hot gas convection in a cylindrical oven where the raw material is kept in motion by means of a worm screw.

Figure 1 shows the PECHINEY plant at LAVAL DE CERE in diagram form. 
Please also see the EC Brochure Wood roasting unit

4.2  Fixed-bed batch processes

These are discontinuous processes, where dehydration and torrefaction occur as an inert gas, whose temperature increases with each stage in the process, is forced through a fixed bed of material. With such processes where heat transfer occurs through convection, the drying and torrefaction stages may be conducted separately, either in separate kilns or at different times.

The process cycle can also be modified to suit materials of different particle size without the need for equipment modification: only reaction times and therefore production rates will change. Two similar techniques are now being marketed by two French industrialists with fairly different end-users in view. Both processes have been tested by the CTFT.

One process developed by Ets. FAGES HABERMANN, operates in a small-scale production unit where two reactors produce 500 t of torrefied wood annually for use as barbecue fuel and as firelighters. The reactor design is very simple, consisting of a kiln in which a basket is placed. Drying and torrefaction both take place in the kiln.

The second process, developed by PILLARD, operates in a 2,000 t/year production unit. The reactor consists of an oven into which tip trucks carry the raw material that has been partially dried prior to loading. In both of these processes, hot gases are forced through the raw material load.

Figure 2 shows the basic principles of the process in diagram form.

5.0  Present & Future Applications

Torrefied wood is a stable industrial product with constant and well-defined properties, it is easily packaged and transported, and thus constitutes a most efficient fuel and reducer. Technically speaking, its competitiveness is no longer open to doubt, and its future in the applications we shall now outline will depend on its economic competitiveness.

5.1  Reduction

With a 30 - 35 % fixed carbon content, torrefied wood appeared to have interesting potential as a reducer.  Experiments were carried out with a trial kiln for the production of silicon metal, which requires an efficient, reactive and mechanically more resistant reducer. These trials were successful: torrefied wood proved to be more reactive and less electrically resistant than the traditional "charcoal and wood" mixture.

These results led Ets PECHINEY to take up the license for the ARMINES torrefaction process and to build the first industrial unit, with EEC backing. This unit has been in operation since early 1987 and supplies over 10 000 t/y of torrefied wood for the reduction of silicon metal.  This industrial and economic success opens up market prospects for several hundred thousand tonnes per year.

5.2  Gasifier Fuel

Long-term gasification trials (4) have been carried out with a fixed bed countercurrent gasifier. The producer gas generated fed a PERKINS motor coupled to a 24 kW electrical generator. measurements were made continuously, comparing equal loads of 77 kg wood and torrefied wood. Results are summarized in Table 5

Torrefied wood as compared to wood gave the following results:

bulletA much higher furnace temperature (over 1300 C) that increases carbon monoxide production 
but will entail the development of an appropriate firebox.
bulletMuch greater regularity in the composition of gases during functioning.
bulletVery clean and high quality gas.
bulletGreater autonomy for the same load (over 30%).

Thanks to a high degree of reproducibility and standardization, torrefied wood facilitates the operation, regulation and optimization of gasifiers. Although it has less energy value than charcoal, it has the advantage of being more convenient to use. Its superior mechanical properties make it less friable, which improves gas transfer and avoids dust formation that clogs up filters. However, contrary to expectations, the acetic acid content in condensates is similar whether wood or Torrefied wood is used for gasification, which means that the problem of corrosion remains.

5.3  Domestic Fuel

Barbecues

 The barbecue market is extensive in France and in Europe, and prospects for torrefied wood have been defined through two different approaches:

A survey carried out among 180 consumers comparing torrefied wood and charcoal.

bulletNature, appearance and cleanness were considered to be satisfactory.
bulletKindling was considered to be easy or very easy, in clear opposition to charcoal kindling.
bulletGlowing embers were considered to form more rapidly
bulletThe product appears to be more appropriate to brisk cooking.
bullet

Absence of smoke during cooking was noted almost unanimously.

The CTFT also carried out standardized tests comparing Meranti wood in unprocessed, torrefied and charcoal form.  The following characteristics were compared in tests carried out at the Gembloux Agronomic Research Center Laboratory:

bulletduration of flame phase
bulletduration of glowing ember phase
bulletweight loss during flame phase
bulletweight loss during ember phase
bulletash and unburned matter

Measurements recapitulated in Table 6 show that:

bulletthe total duration of combustion for torrefied woods in similar to that of unprocessed wood.
bulletthe duration of the glowing ember phase for torrefied woods is also similar to that of wood and 3 times shorter than for charcoal.

In conclusion, although barbecue users seem favorable to the use of torrefied wood, as is borne out by the sale of some 500 tonnes of it for this purpose in France in 1987, objective measurements show that it can be used in ember form for only a third of the time of charcoal embers. This can be a handicap to success in this area.

Domestic use of torrefied wood in developing countries: Tests on improved stoves

A domestic cooking test carried out with the Association Bois de Feu at their experimentation center led to the rapid development of a cook stove suited to the use of torrefied wood and which gives yields similar to those obtained with the best wood stoves.

It was found, moreover, that rekindling is very rapid. Torrefied wood added to a fire kindles very quickly, which makes stove management (control arid variation of heat output) much more flexible than with wood and particularly with charcoal fires.

Principal results are given in Table 7 .

Residential heating / Boiler and wood stove tests

Boiler tests carried out by the CETI&127;AT (5) in comparison with various competing fuels (wood chips, wood pellets, straw, bark and wood mixtures) showed the excellent solid fuel qualities of torrefied wood, which is very well suited to use in continuously functioning boilers because of its high degree of homogeneity and its mechanical durability.

Measurement made showed:

bulletexcellent yields, attaining 76% and over
bullethigher furnace temperature than with other fuels
bulletlow gas emissions
bulletvery low carbon monoxide concentration (low smoke pollution levels).

Tests on wood stove carried out by the CTFT with the LNE at the latter's experimentation center gave the same results, with torrefied wood proving to be clearly superior to wood in the early stage of the combustion cycle. Torrefied wood kindles and gives off heat very quickly, thus heating a room within a short time. However, the high temperatures recorded on the glazed opening and in the stovepipe are a potential hazard and demand careful management of combustion in the boiler.

Early marketing trials indicate that torrefied wood is appreciated as an aid to start an open-hearth fire.

5.4  Slurries

Pulverized mineral coal in suspension with water or in a ternary mixture with petroleum additives can not provide liquid fuel which can be stored and pump-fed for convenient use in driving motors as well as for combustion purposes.

Studies are being carried out on charcoal in suspension form. Torrefied wood” which can be crushed to afairly fine powder and has a high volatile matter content, could prove to be the best suited among ligneous fuels to slurry production from wood.

Together with different partners, the CTFT is now developing a research program in this field.

6.0   Some Economic Data

The two currently operational industrial processes will produce torrefied wood at a cost price of 200 US$ per tonne, from wood with initial moisture content of 35% at a delivery price of 25-30 US$.

Rotation kiln process where heat transfer occurs through conduction is suited to higher production capacities ranging from 7000 to 18000 t/year and more. Investment costs exclusive of building and civil engineering costs amount to I50-170 US$ per tonne of finished product for large-scale units.

The batch processes where heat transfer occurs by convection are applicable where production will range from 2000-4000 t/year, although the initial investment costs required appear on first assessments to be higher, for example, 200 US$ per tonne finished product.

A few years of operation at nominal production levels should confirm these initial cost assessments.

A pre-feasibility torrefaction project estimates carried out in RWANDA, on a 6000 t/year site using plantation Eucalyptus bought on the local market (56 US$/ton of torrefied wood) found that production costs for the torrefied wood obtained would range from 250-260 US$/t, depending on the different elements taken into account and excluding the cost of the technical assistance required at the start and for follow-up work at the initial production unit.

At this price, torrefied wood is competitive in relation to charcoal and should find promising market outlets provided that the acceptability study that is to be implemented confirms the credibility of torrefied wood for potential users.

7.0  Conclusions & Prospects

The physical-chemical characteristics of torrefied wood are of considerable interest, particularly as regards homogeneity and seasonal regularity that are of particular value to potential industrial users.

Furthermore, the production techniques that have now been developed allow for considerable flexibility in adapting the characteristics of torrefied wood to different market requirements. Tests carried out by theCTFT and others have confirmed the various advantages of the product with regards to its potential uses.

Taking into account the socio-economic conditions that are specific to each country and to each tropical region, the particular qualities of torrefied wood indicate it as an appropriate substitute for charcoal in many cases, where favorable repercussions on the environment can be outlined without requiring abrupt   changes in local customs. Whilst providing the same services as charcoal, torrefied wood used as a substitute can result in a two or threefold reduction in wood consumption.

Moreover, in areas with extensive but inefficiently or under-exploited woodland resources, torrefied wood could have considerable impact on small and large-scale industries, as a fuel competing with more conventional sources of energy which have to be imported.

References

(1)        Armines (1984): Proc-d Armines de torrefaction du bois.

(2)        Guyonnet R., Bourgois J., (1985): Le bois torr-fi-: recherche sur les m-canismes r-actionnels.          

(3)        Cazillac J.M., (1988): Etude sur la torr-faction du bois. Suivi indusa&127;iel d'un projet pilote. M-moire de fin d'-tude.

(4)        Corte P Etat du d-veloppement des gazogenes. Action de 1'AFME.

(5)         Cetiat, (1984): La combustion du bois: -tude bibliographique des rejets dans 1'aunosph-re


Up ] TW Bioenergy 1984 ] Upgrading Biomass ] [ FAO Paper ] GCA Paper ] Wood Roasting Unit ]